| 专利侵权纠纷的诉前禁令救济制度研究 |
| Alternative Title | Research on the Patent Infringement Dispute before Litigation Injunctive Relief System
|
| 任玉荣 |
| Subtype | 硕士
|
| Thesis Advisor | 刘斌斌
|
| 2016-05-21
|
| Degree Grantor | 兰州大学
|
| Place of Conferral | 兰州
|
| Degree Name | 硕士
|
| Keyword | 禁令救济
专利侵权纠纷
证据保全
构建完善
|
| Abstract | 随着我国加入世界贸易组织并承诺履行TRIPs协议的相关内容，在专利领域的保护制度建设上，尚需进一步的明确和其他方面的构建完善。我国专利审判的司法实践活动中，关于专利的诉前禁令救济制度不甚完善，往往适用普通的民事诉讼诉前救济措施，这对专利权益人的权益保障不太合理正当。专利侵权纠纷诉前禁令的适用是以利益平衡为原则，进一步的构建利益平衡机制，同时在救济上以临时禁令为价值取向，以完善可操作化的主体权利义务分配为核心，是用于调整与分配专利权益人与被控诉方当事人及社会公众之间利益的一项法律制度，而 诉前禁令救济适用由于其快捷性和有效性已成为我国保护专利权益人及利害关系人的重要手段。
本文试图就专利侵权纠纷的诉前权益救济保障制度加以对比，并结合司法审判经验就相关制度构建完善加以分析：首先，就专利侵权诉前禁令的基本内容加以介绍，包括禁令的产生原因、禁令本身的性质，其次结合上述内容就专利侵权及专利侵权的判定做以分析，必然的衍生出禁令救济的历史演进及类型划分；其次，随着我国履行TRIPs协议的相关内容，对我国司法审判及立法制度的完善确立了明确的指引和方向，我国适用专利侵权诉前禁令救济制度的现状分析，并对适用中凸显的问题归纳提出；最后，构建我国专利保护领域当中的诉前禁令制度应当遵循的原则和审核标准的分析判断，专利侵权诉前禁令制度未来可操作化的构建。 |
| Other Abstract | Along with China's accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) and commitments to fulfill the relevant contents of the TRIPs Agreement, in the field of patent protection system construction, still need to be further clarify and other aspects of construction and improvement. In our country the judicial practice of patent trial and the remedy system of the patent litigation is not very clear, that is often used for ordinary civil litigation for pretrial relief measures, which is not reasonable and legitimate for the protection of the rights and interests of the patent. Before litigation of patent infringement dispute injunction is in order to balance the interests of principle and further construct mechanism of balancing of interests, also in relief to a temporary injunction as the value orientation, in order to improve the operation of the subjects of rights and obligations distribution as the core, is used for adjustment and assignment of patent rights and accused of a legal system of interests between the parties and the public, And the application of the remedies before litigation is due to its efficiency and effectiveness, which has become an important means for the protection of patent rights and interests in China.
In this paper, we try to compare the pre-litigation rights relief and protection system of patent infringement, and combined with the judicial experience on the relevant system to build a sound analysis.The first part: first of all, the basic content of the injunction before litigation of patent infringement to be introduced, including the cause of ban or prohibitions and the nature of the ban itself. Secondly, combined with the content of the patent infringement and the determination of the patent infringement to do the analysis and inevitably derived from the historical evolution and the type of the prohibition of the development of the division. The second part: Along with the related content of TRIPs Agreement in our country, we have established clear guidelines and directions for the perfection of our country's judicial trial and legislative system, and the analysis on the present situation of the application of the pre-injunction relief system in China puts forward the problems which are highlighted in the application concluded. The third part: the construction of our country's patent protection in the field of pre litigation injunction system should follow the principle and the audit standards of the analysis and judg... |
| URL | 查看原文
|
| Language | 中文
|
| Document Type | 学位论文
|
| Identifier | https://ir.lzu.edu.cn/handle/262010/201650
|
| Collection | 法学院
|
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714 |
任玉荣. 专利侵权纠纷的诉前禁令救济制度研究[D]. 兰州. 兰州大学,2016.
|
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
