| 朱某加密行为性质的法律分析 |
| Alternative Title | Analysis On Legal Nature Of Zhu’s Encryption
|
| 陈录军 |
| Subtype | 硕士
|
| Thesis Advisor | 刘绍彬
|
| 2014-11-15
|
| Degree Grantor | 兰州大学
|
| Place of Conferral | 兰州
|
| Degree Name | 硕士
|
| Keyword | 侵权行为
犯罪行为
侵权责任
刑事责任
区别
|
| Abstract | 近年来，我国社会经济高速发展，各种高科技企业也明显增多，相应的各种经济利益诱惑也变化多样，易导致企业员工内部侵权、犯罪处于高发、易发的态势。这种“职务侵权”式的小案件比较多，而动辄过百万、千万的大要案也呈现出大幅度上升的现象，扰乱市场经济秩序。但与此不符的是司法机关开展的破坏生产经营犯罪查办工作却有下滑的趋势，尤其是一些虽然利用现代计算机技术便利，但行为手段和目的却与破坏生产经营犯罪南辕北辙的案件，极易引发罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪的争议。
本文以朱某这样一个不具有典型意义的破坏生产经营案为例，对案例中被告人朱某的加密行为进行了法律分析, 详细探讨了“破坏生产经营罪”主客体构成要件, 并对本案引发的相关理论问题进行了阐述。提出了区别侵权与犯罪的方法,期望对后来的司法理论完善与实践操作有所裨益。
本文内容分为三部分。第一部分阐述“朱某案”基本案情，首先对案件进行简单介绍，之后对案件进行评析研究，指出案件的争议点所在；第二部分是对朱某“加密行为”应如何认定进行论述。“加密行为”是违约、侵权或是犯罪应如何进行司法认定等相关法律问题进行深入探讨，尤其是破坏生产经营罪的构成要件进行了详细剖析；第三部分是参考当今学术界的主流观点和最新法律法规，并对本案引发的相关理论问题进行了阐述，并提出区分侵权行为与犯罪行为的基本方法，以达到在司法实务中准确定性行为，在复杂的案件中最大化的保护企业的合法权益，维护法律的公平、正义。 |
| Other Abstract | In recent years, with the development of China's social and economic survival of the fittest in the increasingly fierce market competition, more and more high-tech enterprises, the temptation of various economic interests are varied, a direct result of employees infringement, crime is high, easy hair trend, "tort duties" type of small cases more, while hundreds of millions, tens of millions of major cases have also shown substantial improvement phenomenon, but with nothing in the case of criminal destruction of production and operation, can easily lead to crime dispute with this crime and non-crime of the crime.
In this paper, the destruction of production and operation Zhu such a case does not have the typical sense, for example, the behavior of the defendant Zhu encryption cases were legal analysis, detailed discussion of the "crime of destruction of production and operation of the" main object constituent elements, and the case related theoretical issues raised are described.
In this paper, the content is divided into three parts. The first part of this paper "Zhu’s case" basic details of a case, first of all, a brief introduction to the case, then analyze the case study, points out that the case of a disputed point is located; The second part is about Zhu Mou how "encryption behavior", "encryption" whether breach of contract, tort or crime should be how to carry out the judicial cognizance and in-depth discussion on the related legal issues, such as, especially the composition of a breach of the production and business operation to a detailed analysis; The third part is refer to current academic mainstream viewpoint and the latest laws and regulations, and relevant theories of the case cause problems are expounded. Put forward the basic method to distinguish tort from crime in the judicial practice in order to achieve accurate qualitative behavior, the maximum in complex cases shall protect the lawful rights and interests of enterprises, maintaining the legal fairness and justice. |
| URL | 查看原文
|
| Language | 中文
|
| Document Type | 学位论文
|
| Identifier | https://ir.lzu.edu.cn/handle/262010/201688
|
| Collection | 法学院
|
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714 |
陈录军. 朱某加密行为性质的法律分析[D]. 兰州. 兰州大学,2014.
|
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
