兰州大学机构库 >法学院
中国古代复仇问题的法律研究
Alternative TitleLegal Research on the Vengeance in the Chinese Ancient Time
唐菀泽
Subtype硕士
Thesis Advisor唐菀泽
2009-05-20
Degree Grantor兰州大学
Place of Conferral兰州
Degree Name硕士
Keyword复仇 根源 冲突 启示
Abstract古代复仇者的结局要么是依法裁决的“死”,要么是被统治者宽赦、社会舆论支持后的“生”,复仇将情理法的冲突体现得淋漓尽致。法治社会里,对复仇的违法性毋庸置疑,但是复仇体现的情理法冲突仍困扰着法治建设。本文通过对古代复仇问题的研究,分析古人在复仇问题上探索的情理法结合的解决方式,对当今法治建设做出有益思考。 第一部分介绍了中国古代关于复仇的立法、司法状况以及社会态度。虽然原始社会不存在复仇与法律的关系,出于完整性,对原始社会复仇状况作了简要介绍。各朝法律对复仇的态度基本保持一致地否定、打击;而实际处置时,司法和社会舆论却对复仇者给予了莫大的同情、支持和鼓励。 第二部分分析了复仇问题的根源和复仇体现的情理法冲突,介绍了古人对复仇问题探索的情理法结合的解决方式及具体运用。由于施报文化的作用、儒家思想的影响以及司法权弊病的存在,复仇屡禁不止。古人为解决复仇问题体现的情理法的冲突进行了探索,采取多元标准,形成了情理法结合的解决方式,立法中形成了有特色的任官制度和恤刑制度,司法上强调执法原情。 在前文的基础上,第三部分探讨了古人在复仇问题上探索的情理法结合解决方式对法治社会的启示。在法治社会首先应当对情、理、法重新认识;其次,正确看待情理法结合在实现法律体系本土化、保障司法公正以及增强判决执行力中的价值;最后,在立法和司法实践中要恰当运用情理法。立法中要恰当吸收情理因素,社会变化时法律中的情理因素也应当作相应调整;在司法实践中要正确发挥情理的作用:结合情理因素进行事实认定;灵活运用情理,发挥调解制度的优势;法律缺位时使用情理弥补;司法应结合情理实现法律目的和社会效果的统一。
Other AbstractThe denouement of ancient avenger, is either to “the death” by legal ruling, or absolved by rulers, public support for the “live”. The conflict of emotion, reason and law will be embodied thoroughly by vengeance. There is no doubt that the vengeance is illegal in the society of rule of law, while on the contrary the conflicts reflected in vengeance are still interfere with the progress of law construction. After researching the ancient system of vengeance and analyzing the methods to solve the conflicts among emotion, reason and law in ancient, this paper proposes the valuable thoughts of the construction of the rule of law. The first part of this paper describes the legislation, the judicial status and the public attitude on vengeance. Although there is no relationship between the vengeance and law in the primitive society, the outline of the vengeance status is still briefly introduced to keep system integrity. The attitude of every Dynasty about vengeance remained consistently negative and against; but practically for the vengeance, the administration of justice and the public opinion had shown a great sympathy, support and encouragement. The second part of this paper focuses on the analysis of the root of vengeance and vengeance conflicts among the emotion, reason and law in ancient. It also introduces the ancients’ solutions and specific applications of the combination of emotion, reason and law. As a result of the cultural influences of seeking revenge back, the impact of Confucianism, as well as the ill performance of judicial power at the meantime, vengeance becomes something that can be never stopped. The ancients carried out countless researches on the conflicts embodied in emotion, reason and law in order to find out a solution to the problem of vengeance, and a solution that adopted a multi-standards is finally being formed and is being widely used. Simultaneously, two kinds of distinctive systems are also being formed which largely reflect the significance of the solution, namely, the officials appointing system and the penalty reducing system. And the factor of social reason and emotional is being properly considered during the course of law enforcement. Base on the research of previous parts, the third part of this paper proposes some revelations of the society of the rule of law. First of all, we should have a fresh concept about emotion, reason and law. Secondly, we should have a correct view to the value of the combination of emo...
URL查看原文
Language中文
Document Type学位论文
Identifierhttps://ir.lzu.edu.cn/handle/262010/201774
Collection法学院
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
唐菀泽. 中国古代复仇问题的法律研究[D]. 兰州. 兰州大学,2009.
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Altmetrics Score
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[唐菀泽]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[唐菀泽]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[唐菀泽]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
No comment.
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.