| 域名及其纠纷解决研究 |
| Alternative Title | The Research Into The Domain Name And The Settlement Of Its Disputes
|
| 赵伯初 |
| Subtype | 硕士
|
| Thesis Advisor | 蔡永民
|
| 2005-05-31
|
| Degree Grantor | 兰州大学
|
| Place of Conferral | 兰州
|
| Degree Name | 硕士
|
| Keyword | 域名权
域名纠纷
域名抢注
解决机制
|
| Abstract | 随着因特网和电子商务的迅速发展，域名的作用越来越大。伴随着域名注册的日益增多，实践中产生了许多域名纠纷，并由此引发出一系列的法律问题，暴露出相关立法与理论的滞后。如何解决域名与商标、商号等传统民事权利客体之间的纠纷，特别是如何认定将他人在先商标、商号等抢先注册为域名的侵权纠纷，成为我们亟待解决的法律课题。
第一部分首先从域名的界定及特征出发，认为对域名法律性质的认定必须用发展的眼光来对待。就目前而言，域名不属于知识产权。第二部分主要对域名与商标权、商号权、姓名权等相关权利之间发生的纠纷进行研究。认为域名纠纷应分为域名合同纠纷和域名侵权纠纷。对实践中大量出现的域名抢注现象不应一概认定为侵权行为，而应进行具体分析。其中，除驰名商标外，对普通商标的域名抢注若是域名注册人不存在恶意，应认为是合法行为；对个人姓名的域名抢注，就我国目前而言，不构成侵权。第三部分主要介绍目前国际国内解决域名纠纷的各种机制，分为司法解决和司法外解决两个方面，对WIPO、ICANN、美国和我国的相关解决方案进行介绍并分析其不足之处。第四部分提出了完善我国互联网域名立法的若干建议。本文认为，立法的滞后是我国域名纠纷层出不穷的重要原因。 |
| Other Abstract | Along with the rapid development of Internet and electronic commerce, the functions of the domain name become greater and greater. Following the increasing day by day of the domain name registration, there also exist the disputes of numerous domain names in practice. That initiates a series of legal questions and exposes the lagging of the relevant legislation and theories. How to solve such disputes between domain name and the traditional civil objects of right(such as trade marks, trading companies and so on ), especially how to recognize that tries to be the first to register the trade marks , the names of trading companies ,etc. which are previously used by others as the infringement disputes of the domain name, becomes our legal subject which we urgently await to be solved.
This article proceeds from the definition and characteristics of the domain name, explains its economic worth and functions. For now, we can't use the concept of the right of the domain name yet, the domain name does not belong to the intellectual property rights.
The second part of this article mainly carries on the research to such disputes taking place between the domain name and the relevant rights like trade mark privileges, rights of trading companies and name rights. It explains the origin and sort of the domain name disputes. It thinks the domain name disputes should be divided into the domain name contract dispute and the domain name infringing dispute .The article treats the latter as the main emphasis of research. For a large number of the domain name cyber-squatting, we should not regard these phenomenons as the tort in practice without exception, and must make a concrete analysis. Among them, except the famous trade marks, the domain name cyber-squatting of the ordinary trade marks, if the domain name registrant does not have evil intentions , should be regarded as the lawful action; the domain name cyber-squatting of the personal names , at present in our country , do not form infringing .
The third part mainly introduces the various kinds of current international and domestic mechanisms of solving such domain name disputes.It is divided into the judicial settlement and the settlement outside the administration of justice. It also makes an introduction to the relevant solutions of WIPO, ICANN, U.S.A. and our country and analyses their weak points.
the fourth part has put forward several suggestions that we should perfect the legislation of the Internet's domai... |
| URL | 查看原文
|
| Language | 中文
|
| Document Type | 学位论文
|
| Identifier | https://ir.lzu.edu.cn/handle/262010/201925
|
| Collection | 法学院
|
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714 |
赵伯初. 域名及其纠纷解决研究[D]. 兰州. 兰州大学,2005.
|
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
