| 由“大连708路公交车致人死亡案”引发的侵权与合同竞合问题的分析 |
| Alternative Title | By The "Bus 708, Dalian Cause Death" Caused By The Analysis Of Concurrence Of Tort And Contract
|
| 徐洪波 |
| Subtype | 硕士
|
| Thesis Advisor | 周桂党
|
| 2011-05-10
|
| Degree Grantor | 兰州大学
|
| Place of Conferral | 兰州
|
| Degree Name | 硕士
|
| Keyword | 请求权竞合
义务视角
义务竞合
救济手段融合
|
| Abstract | 针对侵权和合同的竞合，我国合同法第122条的规定倾向于请求权竞合论中的自由选择的说法，该规定使得责任的分配很难实现均衡，而新制定的侵权责任法又没有对竞合问题做出规定。迄今为止，立法当中没有合理的切合实务当中需求的规定，给实务当中的操作造成了不小的麻烦，迫切需要通过司法解释或者进行立法规制。本文通过对“大连708路公交车致人死亡一案”的分析，针对相关法律问题进行探讨，分析我国现行法律的不足，从大陆和英美两大法系的角度分析竞合问题，并对竞合问题的解决提出建议。本文共五个部分。
第一部分:引言，从现实生活中侵权和合同的存在情况出发，说明对侵权责任和违约责任竞合问题分析的意义。
第二部分：简单的对“大连708路公交车致人死亡案”进行介绍，针对同一案件中责任的承担，各方对于法院的判决看法不一，案件的定性，责任的认定始终伴随案件处理的全过程。同时，总结提出案件当中存在的争议。
第三部分：针对案例中出现的侵权与合同竞合问题，从大陆法系和英美法系两个视角进行探讨。通过比较两大法系对待竞合的态度以及竞合时处理问题的方法和思路，充分吸纳两大法系的长处，摒弃不合理的地方，为该案件的处理提供新的思路，进而为我国处理竞合问题的立法改进进行有益的思考。
第四部分：总结我国现行理论的不足，从请求权概念的不确定引发请求权竞合的混乱、请求权竞合论的不足、当事人自由选择理论的不足等方面充分发掘存在的问题。 |
| Other Abstract | Competing for the tort and contract, our contract law the provisions of section 122 tend Concurrence of the free choice to say, this provision makes difficult to achieve a balanced distribution of responsibilities, and new laws enacted tort liability and no make provision for the issue of competing. So far, the legislation of which there is no reasonable provisions to meet the needs of practice which, to the practical operation of which caused no small trouble, an urgent need for legislation or judicial interpretation of the system. Based on the "Bus 708, Dalian, causing death case" analysis, for the relevant legal issues discussed and analyzed the deficiencies of the existing law, two legal systems from the mainland and the Anglo-American point of view of competing issues, and competing problem solving suggestions. The article contains five parts.
Part I: Introduction, from real life, the existence of tort and contract starting that tort liability and breach of contract on the competing issues of significance.
Part II: Simple on "Dalian bus 708 to cause death" to introduce the same case for accountability, the parties are divided for the court's decision, the qualitative case, the responsibility is always accompanied by the identification of cases handled the entire process. Meanwhile, Summary of cases there is a dispute among.
Part III: Infringement occurs for the case of competing with the contract issues, civil law and common law from two perspectives were discussed. By comparing the two legal systems, and the attitude towards competing when the deal with the problem of competing methods and ideas to fully absorb the strengths of two legal systems to abandon unreasonable, for the handling of cases to provide new ideas, and then deal with competition for China Improvement of legislation together a useful thought.
Part IV: Summary of the current lack of theory, the concept of uncertainty from the claims of competing claims caused by the confusion, the lack of competing claims, the parties lack of freedom of choice theory to explore fully the problems. |
| URL | 查看原文
|
| Language | 中文
|
| Document Type | 学位论文
|
| Identifier | https://ir.lzu.edu.cn/handle/262010/201973
|
| Collection | 法学院
|
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714 |
徐洪波. 由“大连708路公交车致人死亡案”引发的侵权与合同竞合问题的分析[D]. 兰州. 兰州大学,2011.
|
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
