| 物权行为问题研究 |
Alternative Title | A Study on Juristic Act of Real Right
|
| 赵江风 |
Subtype | 硕士
|
Thesis Advisor | 汪振江
|
| 2002-05-12
|
Degree Grantor | 兰州大学
|
Place of Conferral | 兰州
|
Degree Name | 硕士
|
Keyword | 物权
债权
物权行为
交易安全
|
Abstract | 本文研究物权行为理论是以萨维尼对物权与债权的产生与变动根据的严格区分为前提,以物权行为对交易的保护为中心而展开的。
物权与债权的严格区分造就了今天的体系清晰,结构严谨的潘德克吞法体系。物权是支配权,自由主宰着物的占有、使用、收益、处分。债权是请求权,只能请求对方为或不为一定行为,个人没有强制力。由此,物权变动的法律规则也就不同于债权。物权行为则是物权变动的有力武器。物权行为的分离性、无因性、形式性使得物权变动秩序竟然。
本文分六章:第一章分析物权行为的概念;第二章分析物权行为理论的渊源;第三章分析物权行为的原则;第四章分析物权行为的合法性;第六章结语。概念作为法律的“基石”,能清楚其具体的含义。没有明确的法律概念,就没有清晰的法律体系,也不能进行清晰的法律思维。研究物权行为,首先要搞清楚的就是物权行为的概念。物权行为存在的合理性,就是要从其渊源入手考察。物权行为的原则揭示了物权行为对市场经济交易秩序的流畅的巨大作用。
本文的研究方法是从体系的角度,即从潘德克吞体系来阐述物权行为的,并以中德两国学者的见解,即从比较的角度,来确立各国的合理性。 |
Other Abstract | There is theories link by real rights and the production and changes of creditor’s rights with Sa with this texts research real right behaviors according to divide by prerequisite into strictly, launched for the center with protection that the behavior of real right is safe to the trade . Real right and creditor’s rights distinguish and bring up the systems of today clear, of a tightly knit structure law system strictly. The real right is the right of eminent domain, freedom is deciding occupying, using, income, punishing of the thing. Creditor rights to ask right, ask or sure behavior the other, the individual has not forced strength. Therefore, the legal real of the chance of real right is different from creditor rights. The juristic act of real rights is a strong weapon of the chance of real right. Real right is the separation natures of behavior, have because, form quality make real right change is perfect order quality.
This text divides five chapters: Chapter one analyze the concept of the juristic act of real rights; Chapter two analyze the origin of the juristic act of real rights be; Chapter three analyze the principle of the juristic act; Chapter four analyze the rationality of the juristic act of real right; The concept can know its concrete meaning as “foundation stone” of the law. Without clear legal concept, there is no clear legal concept systems, can’t carry on clear legal thinking either. Studying the juristic act of real right, it is a concept of the juristic act of real right that should be clear first. The rationality existing in behavior of real right, will proceed with its origin and observe soon. The principle of the juristic act of real right has announced the behavior smooth enormous function on the trade order of market economy of real right.
The research approaches of this text to at the angles of system, swallow law come and explain real right behavior by system from Pan one. And with the China and Germany scholar’s opinion, namely from the angle that is compared, to established each rationality. |
URL | 查看原文
|
Language | 中文
|
Document Type | 学位论文
|
Identifier | https://ir.lzu.edu.cn/handle/262010/202252
|
Collection | 法学院
|
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 |
赵江风. 物权行为问题研究[D]. 兰州. 兰州大学,2002.
|
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.