| 我国刑事诉讼中非法证据排除规则研究 |
| Alternative Title | Research on the Exclusion of Illegal Evidence in Criminal Proceedings of China
|
| 田俊业 |
| Subtype | 硕士
|
| Thesis Advisor | 俞树毅
|
| 2015-05-15
|
| Degree Grantor | 兰州大学
|
| Place of Conferral | 兰州
|
| Degree Name | 硕士
|
| Keyword | 中国
刑事诉讼
非法证据排除规则
研究
|
| Abstract | 非法证据排除规则彰显出程序正义和尊重人权的光芒，获得了越来越多国家的接受和认可。近年来我国司法上冤假错案、刑讯逼供等现象已令人触目惊心，非法证据排除规则历经坎坷终于在2012年刑诉法修改中予以确立。但是，造法易执法难，非法证据排除规则作为新生力量必然会阻力重重，本文希望对价值冲突、相关立法问题及实践问题进行评析，以期达到拨开雨雾见青天的效果。除引言和结论之外，本文主要内容分为五章：
第一章是通过梳理学者的实证研究及现实观察，指出适用排除规则在现实中并非一帆风顺，其症结主要体现在价值冲突、立法技术问题、法律文化及配套制度的障碍这三大问题上。
第二章是非法证据排除规则的域外比较考察。笔者选取了大陆法系和英美法系的美英德日四个典型国家作为研究对象，在分析其不同的司法体制及法律文化下比较非法证据排除规则适用范围的不同，以期作为我国的法律实践的参考和借鉴。
第三章是对价值冲突的评析。价值的判断是一个巨大的难题，笔者认为价值冲突主要体现在打击犯罪与维护人权、程序正义与实体正义和正义与效益这三个方面，如何平衡冲突还需要我们去思考。
第四章是对现阶段排除规则立法的技术问题评析。新刑诉法吸收了两个规定的有益做法及专家学者的研究成果，排除规则令人眼前一亮。但是，立法上的一些模糊术语在实践中难以执行情况还需要我们去厘清。
第五章是对非法证据排除规则实践问题的评析。徒法不足以自行，纸面上的法再完善在实践中也并不能保证令行禁止。所以，笔者对实践中存在的问题进行了分析，认为主要体现在法律文化的障碍及相关配套制度的缺失，提出通过更新思想观念、完善同步录音录像措施和树立法院基本权威这几个方面着手解决问题。 |
| Other Abstract | The exclusion of illegal evidence manifests the procedural justice and respect and protection of human rights, which has been recognized by more and more countries. In recent years, with such striking phenomenon in our judicial justice as wrongly-charged cases and inquisition by torture, the exclusion of illegal evidence finally has been established in the Amendment of Criminal Procedural Law in 2012. As everyone knows, enforcement is difficult although law-making is easy. There is no doubt that the exclusion of illegal evidence as a new force will be met with much resistance.The thesis hence does in-depth analysis on value conflicts, relevant legislative problems and the reason of being hard to put it into practice. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the thesis is divided into five chapters:The first chapter combs through prior positive research and practical observation.It points out that the application of exclusionary rules in real world is not problem-free whose sticking points lie in value conflicts, legislative technique and obstacles of legal culture and its supporting system.The second chapter comparatively investigates the application of the exclusion of illegal evidence in different countries. The author selects four typical countries as research subjects: Germany and Japan from the continental law system and the United States and British from Anglo-American law system. Through analyzing their different judicial systems and legal culture, the thesis compares their differences in the scope of application so as to provide some reference for our legal practice.The third chapter is to evaluate and analyze value conflicts. It is all known that value judgment is a huge problem. The author holds that value conflicts are mainly reflected in three aspects: striking crimes and protecting human rights, procedural justice and substantive justice, justice and efficiency. Thus, how to balance these conlicts needs us to think over.
The fourth chapter comments on existing technical problems of legislation of the exclusion of illegal evidence. The new Criminal Procedure Law has absorbed beneficial practice of two regulations and research products of experts and scholars, so the exclusion rule is much delightful. However, some terms in legislation are too vague to be put into practice which still need to be cleared up.The fifth chapter reviews practical problems of the exclusion of illegal evidence. As a saying goes, the law alone is not enough.... |
| URL | 查看原文
|
| Language | 中文
|
| Document Type | 学位论文
|
| Identifier | https://ir.lzu.edu.cn/handle/262010/202332
|
| Collection | 法学院
|
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714 |
田俊业. 我国刑事诉讼中非法证据排除规则研究[D]. 兰州. 兰州大学,2015.
|
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
