| 我国量刑规范化研究 |
| Alternative Title | Research on Standardized Sentence in Our Country
|
| 万李黎 |
| Subtype | 硕士
|
| Thesis Advisor | 刘绍彬
|
| 2012-05-09
|
| Degree Grantor | 兰州大学
|
| Place of Conferral | 兰州
|
| Degree Name | 硕士
|
| Keyword | 量刑规范化
规范化改革
实体
程序
|
| Abstract | 量刑失衡问题在世界各国普遍存在，西方国家较早展开了量刑规范化改革，美国和德国分别是英美法系国家和大陆法系国家的典型代表，美国沿其英美法特色，设立了专门的量刑指导机构，建立了数字化的、实体与程序并重的量刑规范体系。德国则沿袭了成文法特色，在刑法和刑事诉讼法中规定了量刑规范化的措施，其设立的量刑公开程序和量刑参与程序对我国量刑规范化的推行尤其具有借鉴意义。
我国也存在着较为严重的量刑失衡现象，此问题引起了刑事司法界和刑法学界的重视。司法界于2003年即展开了量刑规范化的探索，这些探索取得了一定的成果，出台了《规范量刑指导意见》和《量刑程序指导意见》等文件，在量刑规范化之必要性方面达成了共识，并初步形成了实体与程序并重的量刑规范制度体系，同时在我国刑法学界，也对量刑规范化问题进行了更为深入的研究和讨论。
本文在明确量刑规范化相关理论的基础上，结合我国实际状况，借鉴国外先进经验，提出对我国量刑规范化完善的具体设想。 |
| Other Abstract | Western countries launched a sentencing reform in early time, the United States and Germany is a typical representative of the common law countries and civil law countries.
Standardized sentencing refers to action that the judiciary refines the penalty rate under the Criminal Law Provisions on the basis of the criminal law, thus limiting the discretion of the judge, making the judge in the sentencing process in a specific, clear operational standards process. There are many serious sentencing imbalances in the field of Chinese criminal justice.This has aroused the attention of the criminal justice community and the criminal law field. In 2003, the judiciary launched a sentencing standardized exploration which has achieved certain results. They initially formed sentencing norms system which values both entities and procedures . |
| URL | 查看原文
|
| Language | 中文
|
| Document Type | 学位论文
|
| Identifier | https://ir.lzu.edu.cn/handle/262010/202464
|
| Collection | 法学院
|
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714 |
万李黎. 我国量刑规范化研究[D]. 兰州. 兰州大学,2012.
|
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
