《诗经》忠怨诗主旨考--兼论屈赋对《诗经》的继承 | |
Alternative Title | Research on the Gist of Poems expressing Loyalty and Plaint in The Book of Songs-- with the Inheritance Discussion of Qu Fu’s |
杨燕珍 | |
Thesis Advisor | 杨玲 |
2018-04-10 | |
Degree Grantor | 兰州大学 |
Place of Conferral | 兰州 |
Degree Name | 硕士 |
Keyword | 《诗经》 忠怨诗 主旨 屈赋 继承 |
Abstract | 以忠怨诗概念全面考察《诗经》中的诗歌主旨,其中7首诗确定为忠怨诗,另有《国风》5篇和《小雅》7篇主旨需考证。《邶风·柏舟》主旨有两大争论观点,分别是妇人见弃说与仁人不遇说。据考证,后者仁人说更合诗旨,贤臣不得于君,又不忍离去,心绪难平。《王风·黍离》争议较大的是《韩诗》的观点,尹吉甫听信后妻谗言杀子一说。其观点与诗意并不吻合。《诗序》认为是贤臣悲悯宗周变为废墟一说,其应更合诗旨。今人虽新说迭起,但大多也不离诗人家国情怀的主题。《孔子诗论》中批判《黍离》有“怨君”情绪,此评价与诗中对西周陷落的忧愁思绪吻合。《园有桃》是一篇忧时之诗。但所忧何事?历来有多解。据考证,魏国是舜乡,长期实行俭啬政策,过俭则易失礼。诗以园中的“桃”“棘”比兴。“桃”“棘”作为果树中下品,反而被当作佳肴。明显不合礼制,失礼则国将不宁。诗人为国家命运忧心,反而得不到重用和理解,忧愤而作诗。《唐风·采苓》主旨虽已明,但起兴之义历来存在争议。起兴之义不明,则会影响对诗歌主旨的理解。据考证诗中所采“苓”“苦”“葑”都带苦味和寒性,符合《诗经》起兴的逻辑结构,更是贴合诗歌所表达的主题,谗言如所采的“苓”“苦”“葑”植物性质一样使人心苦涩和寒凉。《桧风·羔裘》主旨存在争议。考证也从诗歌起兴着眼。羔裘是朝服,狐裘是外出息民的祭服。首章以“羔裘逍遥,狐裘以朝”暗指君王失职。因其君不听诗人的规劝,可能要面临离开本国,但他的内心牵挂国家,写下《羔裘》劝谏之言,期望君主能幡然悔过。 |
Other Abstract | If the concepts of poems expressing loyalty and plaint are taking as the criterion to examine the gist of The Book of Songs, seven poems can be determined as these kinds of poems, with the gist of five Lessons From The States and seven Minor Odes of the Kingdom left to be verified. There are two main controversial points about the gist of Cypress Boat from Airs of Pei, namely forsaken woman and unrecognized talents. According to research, the point of unrecognized talents is more fit for the gist of this poem, which expresses frustrated virtuous court officials, who want to serve the country, while the emperor never gives them chance. The point of Han Poem involves relatively significant controversy towards Lush Millet of Lessons From The States, in which Yin Jifu (The king's minister) believed his second wife’s slander and killed his son. This viewpoint is not identical to the original thought of the poem. Viewpoints from Poetic Preface, which stand in line with the compassion feelings of virtuous court officials when Zhou dynasty resulted in ruins are more in accord with the thought of poem. Though new viewpoints grow, most are close to the "Family-country" theme. Authors of Confucius Art of Poetry criticize that there is resentment feelings towards king in Lush Millet, and this evaluation is in accord with the poets’ depression towards the downthrow of Western Zhou Dynasty. Peach Trees in Garden is a poem of obsession with country. About what the poet worried for? There are many answers. According to research, State Wei, where is Shun's hometown, have been practicing niggard policies for a long time, while frugality and parsimony may bring disrespect. Metaphor tactics are used in this poem. Peach and thorn are very common fruit trees, while they are treated as delicacy instead, which is unsuited to etiquette. Unrest will come without etiquette. The poet is worried about the fate of his country, but is not able to be reused and understood, so he made this poem with worries and indignation. Though the idea of Cai Ling from the The Wind of Tang is clear, there is controversy on the stimulants to the poems. Unobvious stimulants may affect readers’ understanding of the poem. According to research, “cocklebur”, “chinaberry” and “turnip” in Cai Ling are bitter with cold nature, which is conform to the logical structure of stimulants in The Book of Songs, and fit for the theme of poetry. Calumny just like “cocklebur”, “chinaberry” and “turnip”, making the heart bitter and cold. The gist of Lambskin in Odes of Kuai is in dispute. Reference work sees from the angle of stimulants. Lambskin is the court dress, fox-fur robe is the sacrificia garment for outward ceasing farming. The first chapter uses “wearing lambskin for leisure, and fox-fur robe for court working” to hint at the emperor’s dereliction of duty. The king did not take the poet’s advice, and the poet may face the deportation. But he deeply concerned about the country, so he wrote the poem Lambskin to remonstrate the emperor, hoping he can repent his error. |
URL | 查看原文 |
Language | 中文 |
Document Type | 学位论文 |
Identifier | https://ir.lzu.edu.cn/handle/262010/228866 |
Collection | 文学院 |
Recommended Citation GB/T 7714 | 杨燕珍. 《诗经》忠怨诗主旨考--兼论屈赋对《诗经》的继承[D]. 兰州. 兰州大学,2018. |
Files in This Item: | There are no files associated with this item. |
|