| 《集韵》与《广韵》反切比较 |
| Alternative Title | The Comparison between Jiyun's and Guangyun's Elaboration on the Phenomena of Fanqie
|
| 孙丽静 |
| Thesis Advisor | 张文轩
|
| 2004-05-10
|
| Degree Grantor | 兰州大学
|
| Place of Conferral | 兰州
|
| Degree Name | 硕士
|
| Keyword | 集韵
广韵
反切
|
| Abstract | 本文对《集韵》和《广韵》的反切进行了全面的统计和比较，探究《集韵》和《广韵》音系的异同。
通过比较发现，《集韵》继承《广韵》反切反映出两书音系的相同之处；《集韵》对《广韵》反切的改造既体现了时音的变化，又体现了拼切方法的改进。
《集韵》的重纽归字继承了《广韵》的重纽格局，同时对《广韵》的重纽反切进行删并，归并、混置《广韵》以外有确切来源的重纽字音。这是《集韵》在删并字音时采取《广韵》和时音双重语音标准的反映。《集韵》继承和删并了《广韵》的部分重出小韵，同时又大量增加了重出小韵。《集韵》的绝大多数重出小韵是不反映语音对立的。《集韵》的转移小韵是有规律的小韵调整现象，说明《集韵》和《广韵》所依据的语音开合系统可能有差异。《集韵》转移小韵依据的可能是既不同于邵雍音又不同于朱翱音的另一种方音的开合系统。
通过以上比较发现，《集韵》收录反切的总的特点是遵循《广韵》、反映时音和保存名家经典反切三者结合。这一特点反映在《集韵》全书的始终。对《集韵》和《广韵》反切的比较使我们对《集韵》音系有了更清晰的认识。 |
| Other Abstract | This paper makes a comprehensive statistics and comparison on Fanqies in both Ji Yun and Guang Yun, and explores their similarities and differences on phonology.
By contrast, a lot of Fanqies in Ji Yun come from those in Guang Yun and improve a lot . Most of Fanqies in Ji Yun succeeded from Guang Yun are rational in spelling, reflecting the same aspects of phonology in the two books.
There are two innovative aspects in Fanqies from Ji Yun to Guang Yun: on the one hand, a lot of Leigeqies in terms of Labial and Lingual are altered into Yinheqies; on the other hand, for more direct and convenient spelling, the front word of Fanqie is identified with the word segmented in terms of tone, Kaihe and Hongxi . The previous shows the changes of syllable of the time, that is Bilabiodental and Bilabial, Apical and Blade-Alvelar have been basically differentiated, while the later embodies both changes of syllable of the time and improvements of techniques in spelling. These improvements in the front word of Fanqie in Ji Yun reveal the changes of Head Vowel.
This paper especially compares Chongnius , Chongchu Xiaoyuns and transferred Xiaoyuns in the two books to indicate that Ji Yun embodies changes of syllable of the time as well as patterns from Guang Yun.
The words of Chongnius in Ji Yun not only keep to the pattern in Guang Yun but also delete, merge into and blend with some Chongnius’ syllables with definite sources beyond Guang Yun. As a matter of fact, it is a reflection of double phonetic standard for the syllable of the time and Guang Yun.
Ji Yun follows and deletes parts of Chongchu Xiaoyuns from Guang Yun and at the same time it makes a lot of adding. Except Chongnius ,other Chongchu Xiaoyuns are identical in respect of speech sounds.
Ji Yun transfers some Xiaoyuns and Fanqies in Guang Yun into other Yuns,and these Xiaoyuns are called transferred Xiaoyuns. Most of transferred Xiaoyuns are occurring between the two generally related Yuns. The characteristics of these transferred Xiaoyuns indicate that they are the phenomena regularly adjusted, and indicate phonetic Kaihe systems, on which the two books are based, may differ. The transferred Xiaoyuns in Ji Yun probably depend on Kaihe system for another kind of phonetic aspect of a dialect, which is from neither ShaoYong nor Zhu Ao syllable.
From this paper the general characteristic of Fanqies collected in Ji Yun is a combination of Guang Yun, reflection syllable of the time and preserving Fanqies ... |
| URL | 查看原文
|
| Language | 中文
|
| Document Type | 学位论文
|
| Identifier | https://ir.lzu.edu.cn/handle/262010/228909
|
| Collection | 文学院
|
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714 |
孙丽静. 《集韵》与《广韵》反切比较[D]. 兰州. 兰州大学,2004.
|
Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
